language, politics

Being Wherever

 

A great movie that came out in 1979 was Being There, adapted from the Jerzy Kosinski novel of the same name. Its lead character is a gardener, Chance (Peter Sellers), who has lived all his life in isolation, in the house whose garden he tends for its owner. As a result, he has no real world experience, and so he speaks in vague generalizations in the form of aphoristic statements. (Since he has no way to connect words to actual referents, he cannot speak precisely about anything definite.) Other people take his utterances as true-for-all-time pearls of wisdom, and Chance himself as a prophet.

 

Trump the builder is not much like Chance the gardener, except that in important ways he is – though not in the way he talks, in the way his utterances work on hearers. On the surface the two are altogether different. Chance’s para- and extralinguistics are nonexistent: he speaks as if in a trance, or in a language he doesn’t understand, completely devoid of emotional punctuation in the form of facial expression, intonation, or gesture. That absence gives his words the ring of truth: he is merely a conduit for meaning, he is not personally involved in creating it. Trump’s style is completely different: highly emotional, excited and exciting, fully expressive and committed to what he is saying.

 

Or so it would seem.

 

Although Chance’s and Trump’s superficial communicative strategies are totally different, the effects of both on hearers are remarkably the same: the belief that the speaker is a trustworthy truth-teller. Trump, for all his razzle-dazzle, is making use of a rhetorical strategy that has the same effects on its hearers as the very different strategy employed by Chance.

 

Many years ago Deborah Tannen and I wrote an article in which we discussed two ways in which discourse types could be compared: we called them pragmatic synonymy and pragmatic homonymy. Two forms were pragmatically synonymous in case they had the same intended function, but looked different. So “upspeak” and euphemism may function as pragmatic synonyms: both are ways of saying something and, simultaneously, avoiding responsibility for what is being said. Analogously, the rising intonation of upspeak and that of a typical English yes-no question are pragmatic homonyms: they sound identical, but the first is a form of avoidance, the second a way of expressing a need for information. Trump’s and Chance’s strategies are pragmatic synonyms. They look different, but both make the hearer think she has experienced something profound and moving, while in fact they convey nothing. Both are all things to all people: every hearer hears in every such utterance what she wants to hear, but that meaning is not really there in the utterance itself, but in the hearer’s wishful mind, conveniently enabling the speaker to maintain plausible deniability. Both Trump and Chance offer a wide range of interpretive possibilities, because both are ultimately empty, devoid of real meaning. Both have pragmatics but no semantics – not the art of the deal, but the art of the wheeler-dealer, the snake-oil salesman, the propagandist.

 

Trump is by no means the first dangerous propagandist in history. You may remember Adolph Hitler and his pet propagandist Joseph Goebbels. They gave the world the theory (and practice) of the Big Lie: if you tell a little fib, people may be able to see through it, since they can imagine themselves doing a bit of harmless fibbing; but tell a really big whopper and everyone will say: that is a really amazing claim. No one could possibly have the gall to say it if it weren’t true. So the Big Lie will be believed. Trump is the master of a particular kind of Big Lie, the Big Pragmatic Lie, as opposed to the Hitler-Goebbels Big Semantic Lie.

 

Just how does he do it?

 

A semantic lie, what we usually mean by the term, is a false linkage between language and the reality to which the language purports to refer: it negates meaning. Such a lie can be disproved by uncovering the actual facts — no easy job, but doable. Semantic lies operate mainly at the linguistic, and lexical, level. Words can be questioned and controverted.

 

A pragmatic lie creates a disconnection between an utterance and its presumption of meaning, that is, that there is a meaningful and therefore legitimate connection at all between the words and their purported referents. The words, by design, are magnificent: big, strong, powerful, highly emotional; they appear to engage with important and troublesome issues and to offer comforting solutions to them. The lie seems to enhance meaning, but in fact it confuses it. Because it is done via para- and extralinguistics, it is very hard to point out, analyze, or question: our language is not designed to talk about nonverbal discourse.

 

Trump’s pragmatic lies are wrapped in dazzling para- and extra-linguistics, which give a sense of legitimacy: the speaker is involved, he cares, his emotions are your emotions and therefore legitimate. Trump is a master of the technique: his paralinguistic range is extraordinary, his face and gestures highly expressive, even his clothing intensely communicative. The forcefulness of his extra- and paralinguistic strategies gives the impression that he has actually made meaningful statements. But the words are emotion-carriers, not concept-carriers, and closely examined, signify nothing (except “I am great!”). His superlatives and high-flown language are empty substitutes for semantic explicitness. He uses pugnacity and bullying to disguise the fact that he is evading answers rather than providing them. We can call his technique, “hyperbolic avoidance”: the use of exaggerated pragmatics to conceal impoverished semantics. (Trump himself, in The Art of the Deal, refers to his technique as “truthful hyperbole,” but that itself is not truthful, though certainly hyperbolic.)

 

In his interesting article about Trump’s success, in the August 31 New Yorker, Evan Osnos gives several examples of the technique at work. Arriving in Laredo, Texas, he remarks that he feels unsafe (being so close to the border). He is asked why. His reply:

 

“Well, they say it’s a great danger, but I have to do it. I love the country. There’s nothing more important than what I’m doing.”

He seems to be picking up on the question, i.e. answering responsively, by echoing “unsafe” with “danger,” a form of anaphora. But the “answer” is vague and evasive: who are “they,” and what is “it”? What, exactly, does he “love to do”? How does his patriotism in any way respond to why he feels “unsafe” on this bit of U.S. soil? Yet, if you’re not listening closely, you are apt to be left with a positive, upbeat – yet wary – message: here is a man who, for love of our country, would take a bullet for you. When a self-identified person of Greatness makes this offer, you cannot refuse. He’s your man and you will protect and defend him, as he will you.

As this and other examples of Trumpese illustrate, The Donald makes effective use of the little words: pronouns and similar words that normally have antecedents that supply their reference, but in his utterances those antecedents are missing and we have to fill them in. Each of us fills in our own. Thus, in the brief example above, the two “it’s”; the empty “they”; the vague “what I’m doing.” Encouraging hearers to draw the desired conclusion is the hyperbole: “There’s nothing more important than what I’m doing,” because “I” am the most important man in the world.

It is possible that Trump’s hyperbolic avoidance represents his ignorance of something any serious candidate for the presidency of the country should know: the powers and constraints of the office: can POTUS, on his own, build a bridge across the border? Ship millions of people across that border against their will? For over 200 years we have had a document called the Constitution, which is quite specific in laying out just what the President can and can’t do, and the two possibilities above happen to be two of the things he can’t.

Possibly Trump is conflating “POTUS,” a position that has strict checks and balances, with “Chairman and President of the Trump Organization,” a very different position that permits its holder many privileges not available to POTUS. Trump never addresses this important distinction.

My favorite Trumperies express his feelings about women. He has been subjected to some scrutiny on this topic following the Megyn Kelly contretemps. He has done his manful best to reveal the kind of guy The Donald really is, womanwise.

The women I think I’ll do great with because I cherish women…. I will be the best thing that ever happened to women. I cherish women.

I will take care of women’s health and women’s health issues better than anybody and far better than Hillary Clinton, who doesn’t have a clue.

Underlying many of his remarks about his feelings about, and dealings with, women, is implicit sexual innuendo: he “does great” with women, he will be “the best thing that ever happened to women.” These comments leave me with the same queasiness that his pre-candidate comments always did, when he talked about his requirement for “quality women” and his preference for “supermodels.” All suggest that – no matter what he claims to mean – he sees and will always see women as subordinate to him and of value to him only to the degree that they are sexually available and desirable to him.

But he says he “cherishes” women! Isn’t that nice? Isn’t that respectful?

No.

“Cherish” is a word with great emotional power, which means that it should be used with caution. Normally, its use implies that its subject and direct object have a deep, caring, and emotionally strong relationship. We don’t “cherish” strangers and we don’t “cherish” masses of undifferentiated people. To say that you “cherish women” suggests to me that you can’t and don’t care to tell us apart or see us as individuals. Or maybe just that you don’t know the meaning of “cherish,” other than that it makes you sound as if you had human feelings.

Here is another example of Trump’s use of repetition, or anaphora. Repetition is a form of emotional emphasis: it says, “I really care.” It does not necessarily mean that the speaker really cares.

The second item annoys me even more, since it perfectly illustrates The Donald’s majestic and monumental gall. Just what, if anything, is his expertise in “women’s health issues”? Would he know a woman’s health issue if he saw it? Is there any expertise in the world that he cannot or will not claim? He’s saying that he knows more about your wherever than you do, because you’re just you and he is The Donald. The idea that Donald J. Trump automatically knows more about women and their bodies than they do is insulting to half the world’s population, yet no one to my knowledge has tried to confront him on that. His claim would be reasonable only if he were a licensed whereverologist. The Hillary bashing makes sense only if you read his statement about knowing more about these things than “Hillary” as invoking a metonymy in which “Hillary” stands for “all women.” (Otherwise, how could he possibly know what “Hillary” knows and doesn’t know? Even a four-year-old has a more sophisticated theory of mind.)

Trump’s communicative strategy is appalling and dangerous. We have not seen its like in a long time – not, in fact, since the 1940s, in Germany.

 

 

Standard

203 thoughts on “Being Wherever

  1. Pingback: best

  2. Pingback: fucoxanthin

  3. Pingback: geniux pills

  4. Pingback: intelligex

  5. Pingback: intellux

  6. Pingback: probrain

  7. Pingback: radian-c

  8. Pingback: red rhino supplement

  9. Pingback: spartagen xt where to buy

  10. Pingback: supreme antler

  11. Pingback: testomax200 reviews

  12. Pingback: genius reviews

  13. Pingback: testomax

  14. Pingback: spartagen where buy

  15. Pingback: g700 flashlight tactical military grade

  16. Pingback: G700 led flashlight

  17. Pingback: lumitact g700 led flashlight

  18. Pingback: g700 flashlight reviews

  19. Pingback: organifi green juice powder

  20. Pingback: g700 led flashlight

  21. Pingback: garcinia cambogia xt

  22. Pingback: garcinia cambogia xt natural cleanse

  23. Pingback: garcinia cambogia xt and natural cleanse plus

  24. Pingback: garcinia xt natural cleanse plus

  25. Pingback: TRACKR BRAVO promo codes

  26. Pingback: alpha f1

  27. Pingback: alpha fuel

  28. Pingback: alpha man pro

  29. Pingback: alpha peak

  30. Pingback: alpha xtrm

  31. Pingback: caralluma extract

  32. Pingback: cla safflower oil weight loss

  33. Pingback: dermavie anti aging

  34. Pingback: anabolic rx24

  35. Pingback: cognifocus

  36. Pingback: garcinia cambogia xt

  37. Pingback: garcinia lean xtreme

  38. Pingback: garcinia melt

  39. Pingback: hydrolzse eye cream

  40. Pingback: max synapse

  41. Pingback: nerventrax

  42. Pingback: nutra forskolin

  43. Pingback: premium cleanse

  44. Pingback: testorip

  45. Pingback: testoroar

  46. Pingback: zynev

  47. Pingback: garcinia cambogia slim pure detox

  48. Pingback: garcinia cambogia ultra

  49. Pingback: garcinia slim pure detox

  50. Pingback: premium cleanse garcinia cambogia

  51. Pingback: royal garcinia cambogia

  52. Pingback: garcinia cambogia 80 hca

  53. Pingback: gnc garcinia cambogia

  54. Pingback: raspberry ketone plus

  55. Pingback: raspberry ketone max

  56. Pingback: forskolin belly buster

  57. Pingback: pro forskolin

  58. Pingback: forskolin slim

  59. Pingback: garcinia cleanse

  60. Pingback: ultra trim 350 forskolin

  61. Pingback: garcinia xt

  62. Pingback: g700 led flashlight

  63. Pingback: forskolin weight loss

  64. Pingback: pure garcinia cambogia extract

  65. Pingback: garcinia cambogia pure extract

  66. Pingback: garcinia cambogia premium

  67. Pingback: forskolin fuel

  68. Pingback: garcinia lean xtreme

  69. Pingback: vitapulse coupon code

  70. Pingback: vitapulse

  71. Pingback: Vita pulse

  72. Pingback: vitapulse supplements

  73. Pingback: vitapulse reviews

  74. Pingback: vitapulse review

  75. Pingback: pure colon detox

  76. Pingback: pure colon detox

  77. Pingback: somnapure

  78. Pingback: perfect biotics coupon code

  79. Pingback: perfect biotics reviews

  80. Pingback: buy perfect biotics

  81. Pingback: vitapulse scam alert

  82. Pingback: reviews vitapulse

  83. Pingback: princeton nutrients vitapulse

  84. Pingback: vitapulse antioxidant

  85. Pingback: vitapulse vitamins

  86. Pingback: vitapulse scam

  87. Pingback: vitapulse

  88. Pingback: vitapulse

  89. Pingback: vita pulse

  90. Pingback: probiotic america

  91. Pingback: traits of taurus man in love

  92. Pingback: taurus traits

  93. Pingback: Fat Loss Factor reviews

  94. Pingback: 7 Steps To Health And The Big Diabetes Lie ebook

  95. Pingback: Sciatica SOS pdf

  96. Pingback: Sciatica SOS ebook

  97. Pingback: Diabetes 60 System review

  98. Pingback: Diabetes Destroyer review

  99. Pingback: How To Get Rid Of Candida reviews

  100. Pingback: Everyday Roots reviews

  101. Pingback: Natural Clear Vision

  102. Pingback: Grow Taller 4 Idiots pdf

  103. Pingback: Yeast Infection No More ebook

  104. Pingback: Yeast Infection No More scam

  105. Pingback: Natural Clear Vision ebook

  106. Pingback: Shapeshifter Yoga scam

  107. Pingback: Paddison Program For Rheumatoid Arthritis pdf

  108. Pingback: 7 Steps To Health And The Big Diabetes Lie scam

  109. Pingback: Eczema Free Forever

  110. Pingback: Rapid Reflux Relief pdf

  111. Pingback: Shapeshifter Yoga pdf

  112. Pingback: How To Lose Cellulite Fast ebook

  113. Pingback: Kidney Disease Solution scam

  114. Pingback: Alexapure Pro Reviews

  115. Pingback: Test x180 Ignite

  116. Pingback: Ecomaxx Reviews

  117. Pingback: T90 Xplode Review

  118. Pingback: Maxtropin Review

  119. Pingback: Fungus Key Pro Review

  120. Pingback: Tea tox

  121. Pingback: Forever Bust Review

  122. Pingback: Tai Cheng

  123. Pingback: MegaDrox Review

  124. Pingback: Christian Filipina dating

  125. Pingback: Test X180

  126. Pingback: Breast Actives reviews

  127. Pingback: vitapulse

  128. Pingback: vita pulse coupon code

  129. Pingback: probiotics america

  130. Pingback: probiotic america

  131. Pingback: niagen anti aging

  132. Pingback: midogen live cell research, mitogen

  133. Pingback: GNC Garcinia Cambogia

  134. Pingback: drones for sale with camera

  135. Pingback: useful reference

  136. Pingback: his comment is here

  137. Pingback: Piano For All Review

  138. Pingback: Learn Photo Editing Ebook Review

  139. Pingback: Survival Md

  140. Pingback: thedraftdashboard.review

  141. Pingback: find this

  142. Pingback: this contact form

  143. Pingback: More about the author

  144. Pingback: original site

  145. Pingback: More about the author

  146. Pingback: browse this site

  147. Pingback: great post to read

  148. Pingback: original site

  149. Pingback: my company

  150. Pingback: Check This Out

  151. Pingback: check my blog

  152. Pingback: Clicking Here

  153. Pingback: internet

  154. Pingback: internet

  155. Pingback: The Beta Switch

  156. Pingback: dig this

  157. Pingback: directory

  158. Pingback: you can try this out

  159. Pingback: why not find out more

  160. Pingback: find more

  161. Pingback: Photography-jobs.net Reviews

  162. Pingback: you can try this out

  163. Pingback: anchor

  164. Pingback: additional hints

  165. Pingback: navigate to these guys

  166. Pingback: Visit Website

  167. Pingback: Forex Trendy

  168. Pingback: check these guys out

  169. Pingback: my site

  170. Pingback: Forex Trendy

  171. Pingback: Organic Health Protocol

  172. Pingback: Superior Singing Method

  173. Pingback: my site

  174. Pingback: Visit Website

  175. Pingback: her latest blog

  176. Pingback: his explanation

  177. Pingback: Get Taller 4 Idiots Review

  178. Pingback: thewpprofitbuilder.review

  179. Pingback: find more

  180. Pingback: why not find out more

  181. Pingback: hop over to this website

  182. Pingback: Penis Enlargement Remedy

  183. Pingback: her latest blog

  184. Pingback: other

  185. Pingback: other

  186. Pingback: why not find out more

  187. Pingback: click here

  188. Pingback: click here

  189. Pingback: tires

  190. Pingback: wheels

  191. Pingback: 2017 Newest HP 17 Premium High Performance Laptop PC 17 3 inch HD Display 1600 x 900 Intel i5 7200U Dual Core reviews

  192. Pingback: ASUS Transformer Book T100TA C1 GR 10 1 Inch Convertible 2 in 1 Touchscreen Laptop reviews

  193. Pingback: Dell Inspiron 15 7568 Intel Core i7 6500U X2 2 5GHz 8GB 256GB SSD 15 6 Black Certified Refurbished reviews

  194. Pingback: Dell Latitude E5430 14 Notebook PC Intel Core i3 2350M 2 3GHz 8GB 320GB DVDRW Windows 10 Professional Certified reviews

  195. Pingback: Dell Latitude E7440 14 LED Touch Screen 1920x1080 Ultrabook Intel Core i7 i7 4600U 16GB RAM 512GB Solid State reviews

  196. Pingback: HP 11 6 Pink Stream 11 d011wm Laptop with Intel Celeron Processor 2GB Memory 32GB Hard Drive Bluetooth Windows reviews

  197. Pingback: HP EliteBook 8440p Intel Core i5 540M 2 53GHz 4GB 250GB Windows 10 Home x64 reviews

  198. Pingback: HP Pavilion 15 ay061nr 15 6 Laptop Intel Pentium N3710 2 56GHz 8GB 500GB Win 10 reviews

  199. Pingback: Lenovo ThinkPad Edge 15 03193SU 15 6 LED Notebook Core i3 i3 380M 2 53GHz 4GB DDR3 500GB HDD DVD Writer Intel reviews

  200. Pingback: Lenovo ThinkPad T420 Laptop WEBCAM Intel Core i5 2 50ghz 8GB DDR3 320GB DVDRW Windows 10 Pro 64bit reviews

  201. Pingback: Vulcan Venture II VNB11602IE 11 6 Slim Laptop White Intel Atom Z3735F 1 83 GHz 2GB DDR3 32GB Flash Memory reviews

  202. Pingback: read more

  203. Pingback: read more

Comments are closed.