gender, language, other topics, politics

Going Negative

 

The media savants love numbers – it makes their work look like science. Among their favorites, often repeated, are the “negatives” of the leading presidential candidates. Commentators love to point out that this year, the two front-runners score higher negatives than their equivalents at any time in the past. For Trump, the stats are: positive 24%, negative 57%, for a total score of -33; for Clinton, positive 31%, negative 52%, overall -21.

 

Because the stats are reported side by side, it is easy to get the impression that the negative scores for the two candidates mean the same thing and were in response to the same kinds of behavior. Curiously, the media analysts never address that question – the negs simply are what they are: they show how unlikeable Trump and Clinton are, period.

 

But the two negativities are in fact very different in origin and meaning, and should be differently understood.

 

It’s easy to see why a lot of people loathe Trump: his racism, his anti-Muslim remarks, his misogyny, his cheerful unconcern about his ignorance of practically everything a president needs to know, the remarkable size of his ego (and his hands). When people say they would never vote for him, they mean that in the most literal way: they are quite rationally afraid of what he might do if he became president. There is a direct and logical correlation between Trump’s behavior as a candidate for the most powerful job in the world, and people’s concerns about how he would govern.

 

In Clinton’s case, it is very hard to discern any reasonable parallels. Yes, there’s Benghazi and the alleged emails and her cozy relationships with Wall Street. But let’s try to be sensible here: in each of these cases, either the allegations have proven false, or they are no different from what other candidates (and presidents) do and have always done, or they are totally irrelevant to anything. But people keep bringing them up, desperate to find real reasons for the discomfort they actually feel when they think of Hillary Rodham Clinton running the United States of America.

 

There are a few semi-rational reasons for Clinton’s negatives. One is that she has been in the public eye for so long – twenty-five years and more. Over that stretch of time, if you aren’t a saint or a shrinking violet, you will do and say things that some people will object to. You will make enemies.

 

And Hillary Clinton, like her husband, has been the subject of a remarkable amount of scurrilous attention over that time. From their arrival in Washington in 1993 (and before), they were the focus of one unproven allegation after another: Fostergate, Filegate, Travelgate, Whitewater, the impeachment, ad infinitum. Conceivably the Clintons are really extraordinarily wicked. But more likely (since most of these allegations vanished under scrutiny), they were the recipients of extraordinary amounts of enmity on the part of the Republicans, still smarting from Watergate, the Clarence Thomas hearings, and the rejection of the Robert Bork Supreme Court nomination. Conservatives were thirsting for blood and determined to get it. And the Clintons made natural targets – as I suggested in The Language War, they crossed gender lines literally and symbolically, a very scary business. So the fake charges hung around regardless of truthfulness or even plausibility. They weren’t about what they were purportedly about, and therefore proving the falsehood of what they were purportedly about had no effect. And these false accusations linger today, forming the basis of Clintonphobia and the “reason” for all those negatives.

 

But the real reason, which underlies and strengthens the first two, is this: Hillary Clinton is an ambitious, accomplished, and powerful woman. Many people, male and female alike, find such a person terrifying. That terror, the basis of charges of “unlikability” and “inauthenticity,” is transmuted into a respectably macho reason for the fears they are experiencing for other reasons: fears of unemployment and poverty; fear of the diminution of the respect they feel they are owed as Americans by citizens of other countries; fears of encroachment by others, of what is theirs being taken over by them. These fears make them feel weak and helpless; but when they are turned into misogyny and sexism, they make both men and women feel strong, like good, “normal” males and females. And when that sexism/misogyny finds an obvious target, a woman daring to venture out of the boundaries women are still supposed to respect, such a woman will find a natural role as the most hated and feared person imaginable.

 

So Trump’s positives (the reasons his supporters adore him) and Clinton’s negatives stem from the same underlying sources, and Trump, in heaping kindergarten terms of abuse on his presumptive eventual opponent, is making the most of that.

 

Who is the most feared and hated woman in America? went a joke of the mid-1990s. Tonya Rodham Bobbitt

 

“Tonya” and “Bobbitt” have slipped into oblivion, but “Rodham” is still with us. All three were notorious in the ‘90s for threatening or taking over male privilege in one way or another – being literally (Bobbitt) or figuratively “castrating.” The more insecure men feel about their status and their power, the more necessary it is for them to find a woman to blame for their insecurity. Note the placement of “Rodham” in the middle: not only is there the implicit suggestion in “Rod” that she has a penis, but she has the effrontery to choose to use her birth name.

 

So Trump’s negatives are based on his individual, actual, bad behavior, but Clinton’s are not based on anything she actually has done, but on the group of which she is a member and symbolically represents. Trump can (and may be starting to) make his behavior more presidential, and if he succeeds and becomes the Republican nominee, his negatives will diminish. But Clinton can do nothing about hers. And her opprobrium functions, as it is intended to, as a warning to all women, like the currently fashionable rape threat: behave like this, cross gender lines like this, and everyone will hate you and destroy you.

 

And because Clinton is seen as a “bad woman” rather than as a unique individual uniquely behaving badly, that assessment of her is typical of assumptions societies make based on noxious stereotypes of “others.” A frequent, and of course false, assumption about others by “us” is that “they all look alike” (where “we” are unique individuals). This assumption is all too frequently among whites about African Americans. I recall a class in which I had remarked about the power and falsity of this assumption and its basis. One student objected: “But they do all look alike!”

 

There were titters all around the room. I suspect that the reason for the titterers was that secretly, the titterers agreed and were glad that she, not they, had uttered the unspeakable. The idea that less-powerful others lack even the human attribute of individuality is very attractive to those in the empowered group. It justifies their status.

 

Women are not generally considered to “all look alike.” But we are considered to all think alike and have the same (noxious) character: we are liars and deceivers, for instance. So Trump’s “crooked Hillary” falls on fertile ground. This is one reason why the repeated charges against HRC never go away: they must be right, or right enough. She is a woman. What else do you need to know? And that assumption, in turn, justifies all forms of gender terrorism.

 

For instance, there is the widespread use on the Internet of rape threats against women whose only crime is that they have spoken at all (not even, necessarily, against male privilege, although that helps). Steven Thrasher, an editor of the Guardian US, reported on NPR’s “The Takeaway” on April 14 on a survey he and his colleagues did. They examined 17 years (1999 – 2016) of Internet comments on articles on the Guardian’s web site, some 70,000 in all. Although women were in the minority of the authors, of the ten top writers to get abusive comments directed at them, 8 were women (the other two were African American males). Thrasher noted that the majority of the articles that generated abusive responses were not threatening in any way: the objection was simply that the writers were female. Their crime: speaking while female. This observation fits right in with the negativity toward Clinton as a woman.

 

Just as it isn’t just men who voice these sentiments, it isn’t only those bad misogynist Republicans. They also propel the “Bernie Bros” within the Democratic party, the 2016 descendants of the “iron my shirt!” juveniles of 2008.

 

Some liberal Democrats, especially women, claim that their opposition to Clinton has nothing to do with her gender. If she were someone else – Elizabeth Warren, for instance – they wouldn’t feel that loathing. But I bet that if the candidate were Warren, they would still find ways to find fault with her. It isn’t anything Clinton says, or what she has (allegedly) done, that makes her odious: it is that as a woman she has said and done things that people of all genders are still apt to consider the province of the male.

 

And that is yet another reason why Clinton must be elected: only a woman president of the United States of America can begin to alter these noxious habits of mind.

 

Standard

207 thoughts on “Going Negative

  1. Pingback: best

  2. Pingback: fucoxanthin

  3. Pingback: intelligex

  4. Pingback: intellux

  5. Pingback: probrain

  6. Pingback: radian-c

  7. Pingback: red rhino

  8. Pingback: spartagen xt where to buy

  9. Pingback: supreme antler

  10. Pingback: testomax200 reviews

  11. Pingback: genius reviews

  12. Pingback: testomax

  13. Pingback: spartagen where buy

  14. Pingback: g700 flashlight tactical military grade

  15. Pingback: G700 led flashlight

  16. Pingback: lumitact g700 led flashlight

  17. Pingback: g700 flashlight reviews

  18. Pingback: organifi green juice powder

  19. Pingback: garcinia cambogia xt

  20. Pingback: garcinia cambogia xt natural cleanse

  21. Pingback: garcinia cambogia xt and natural cleanse plus

  22. Pingback: garcinia xt natural cleanse plus

  23. Pingback: TRACKR BRAVO discount codes

  24. Pingback: alpha f1

  25. Pingback: alpha fuel

  26. Pingback: alpha man pro

  27. Pingback: alpha peak

  28. Pingback: alpha xtrm

  29. Pingback: caralluma extract

  30. Pingback: cla safflower oil weight loss

  31. Pingback: dermavie anti aging

  32. Pingback: anabolic rx24

  33. Pingback: cognifocus

  34. Pingback: garcinia cambogia xt

  35. Pingback: garcinia lean xtreme

  36. Pingback: garcinia melt

  37. Pingback: hydrolzse eye cream

  38. Pingback: max synapse

  39. Pingback: nerventrax

  40. Pingback: nutra forskolin

  41. Pingback: premium cleanse

  42. Pingback: testorip

  43. Pingback: testoroar

  44. Pingback: zynev

  45. Pingback: garcinia cambogia slim pure detox

  46. Pingback: garcinia cambogia plus

  47. Pingback: garcinia cambogia ultra

  48. Pingback: garcinia slim pure detox

  49. Pingback: premium cleanse garcinia cambogia

  50. Pingback: royal garcinia cambogia

  51. Pingback: garcinia cambogia 80 hca

  52. Pingback: gnc garcinia cambogia

  53. Pingback: raspberry ketone plus

  54. Pingback: raspberry ketone max

  55. Pingback: forskolin belly buster

  56. Pingback: pro forskolin

  57. Pingback: forskolin slim

  58. Pingback: garcinia cleanse

  59. Pingback: ultra trim 350 forskolin

  60. Pingback: garcinia xt

  61. Pingback: g700 led flashlight

  62. Pingback: forskolin weight loss

  63. Pingback: pure garcinia cambogia extract

  64. Pingback: garcinia cambogia premium

  65. Pingback: forskolin fuel

  66. Pingback: garcinia lean xtreme

  67. Pingback: vitapulse coupon code

  68. Pingback: Vita pulse

  69. Pingback: vitapulse supplements

  70. Pingback: vitapulse reviews

  71. Pingback: vitapulse review

  72. Pingback: pure colon detox

  73. Pingback: pure colon detox

  74. Pingback: somnapure

  75. Pingback: perfect biotics coupon code

  76. Pingback: perfect biotics

  77. Pingback: perfect biotics reviews

  78. Pingback: buy perfect biotics

  79. Pingback: vitapulse scam alert

  80. Pingback: reviews vitapulse

  81. Pingback: princeton nutrients vitapulse

  82. Pingback: vitapulse antioxidant

  83. Pingback: vitapulse vitamins

  84. Pingback: vitapulse scam

  85. Pingback: vitapulse

  86. Pingback: vita pulse

  87. Pingback: probiotic america

  88. Pingback: man negative

  89. Pingback: taurus

  90. Pingback: Eczema Free Forever pdf

  91. Pingback: Natural Clear Vision reviews

  92. Pingback: How To Get Rid Of Candida review

  93. Pingback: Organifi Green Juice

  94. Pingback: Ultimate Herpes Protocol

  95. Pingback: High Blood Pressure Diet

  96. Pingback: Yeast Infection No More pdf

  97. Pingback: High Blood Pressure Diet

  98. Pingback: Grow Taller 4 Idiots

  99. Pingback: Paddison Program For Rheumatoid Arthritis review

  100. Pingback: Brain Revitalizer scam

  101. Pingback: How To Lose Cellulite Fast review

  102. Pingback: How To Lose Cellulite Fast

  103. Pingback: How To Lose Cellulite Fast pdf

  104. Pingback: 7 Steps To Health And The Big Diabetes Lie review

  105. Pingback: Brain Revitalizer reviews

  106. Pingback: Hypothyroidism Revolution pdf

  107. Pingback: Alexapure Pro

  108. Pingback: Test x180 Ignite Review

  109. Pingback: Ecomaxx Review

  110. Pingback: T90 Xplode

  111. Pingback: Maxtropin Review

  112. Pingback: Fungus Key Pro Reviews

  113. Pingback: Tea Tox Reviews

  114. Pingback: Forever Bust

  115. Pingback: Tai Cheng

  116. Pingback: MegaDrox

  117. Pingback: Christian Filipina dating

  118. Pingback: Test X180 Reviews

  119. Pingback: Test X180

  120. Pingback: Breast Actives reviews

  121. Pingback: vitapulse

  122. Pingback: princeton nutrients coupon code

  123. Pingback: recapture 360

  124. Pingback: probiotic america

  125. Pingback: perfect biotics probiotic america

  126. Pingback: Perfect Biotics

  127. Pingback: niagen reviews

  128. Pingback: midogen review 2016

  129. Pingback: GNC Garcinia Cambogia

  130. Pingback: click for more info

  131. Pingback: Heartburn No More Reviews

  132. Pingback: Vfx Body Reviews

  133. Pingback: Piano For All Review

  134. Pingback: Learn Photo Editing Ebook Review

  135. Pingback: have a peek at these guys

  136. Pingback: have a peek at these guys

  137. Pingback: see it here

  138. Pingback: thebulletproofhome.review

  139. Pingback: Hybeam Mini Flashlight reviews

  140. Pingback: get redirected here

  141. Pingback: More about the author

  142. Pingback: Source

  143. Pingback: news

  144. Pingback: useful reference

  145. Pingback: Cash Blurbs Reviews

  146. Pingback: Acne No More Ebook Review

  147. Pingback: Insta Builder

  148. Pingback: my review here

  149. Pingback: Half Day Diet Plan Review

  150. Pingback: page

  151. Pingback: this

  152. Pingback: check that

  153. Pingback: you can try this out

  154. Pingback: Get More Information

  155. Pingback: her latest blog

  156. Pingback: Guilt Free Dessert

  157. Pingback: Save The Marriage Ebook Review

  158. Pingback: Photography-jobs.net Review

  159. Pingback: hop over to this website

  160. Pingback: Joe Vitale Certified Review

  161. Pingback: Read More Here

  162. Pingback: anchor

  163. Pingback: thewakeup-lean.review

  164. Pingback: check my site

  165. Pingback: Psoriasis Revolution Review

  166. Pingback: their explanation

  167. Pingback: Forex Trendy

  168. Pingback: theorganichealthprotocol.review

  169. Pingback: hop over to this website

  170. Pingback: why not try these out

  171. Pingback: other

  172. Pingback: see this

  173. Pingback: i thought about this

  174. Pingback: see this here

  175. Pingback: her latest blog

  176. Pingback: Magic Of Making Up Course

  177. Pingback: thegettaller4idiots.review

  178. Pingback: Wp Profit Builder

  179. Pingback: pop over to these guys

  180. Pingback: dig this

  181. Pingback: internet

  182. Pingback: my site

  183. Pingback: look at this web-site

  184. Pingback: other

  185. Pingback: internet

  186. Pingback: official site

  187. Pingback: 60 day fix review

  188. Pingback: click here

  189. Pingback: click here

  190. Pingback: tires

  191. Pingback: rims

  192. Pingback: wheels

  193. Pingback: Acer C720P 2625 11 6 Inch Chromebook reviews

  194. Pingback: Asus VivoBookCapacitive Multi Touch LED Intel Core i3 2365M Dual Core 1 4GHz 4GB DDR3 500GB SATA HDMI USB reviews

  195. Pingback: Dell Latitude E6230 Premier business Laptop 12 5 LED Intel Core i5 i5 3320M 2 60 GHz 8GB RAM 500GB Hard Drive reviews

  196. Pingback: HP 250 HP 250 G3 Notebook PC M5G54UT ABA reviews

  197. Pingback: HP Chromebook 11 G4 11 6 Inch Laptop Intel N2840 Dual Core 2GB RAM 16GB Flash SSD Chrome OS Black reviews

  198. Pingback: HP Pavilion 15 Touch 4K Gaming Laptop Intel i7 6700HQ 16GB DDR4 RAM 128GB SSD 1TB 7200rpm HDD NVIDIA GTX reviews

  199. Pingback: Lenovo ThinkPad Edge E555 20DHS00800 15 6 Inch Laptop Black reviews

  200. Pingback: Lenovo ThinkPad T420 Laptop WEBCAM i5 2 50ghz 8GB DDR3 320GB DVDRW Windows 10 Home 64bit Certified reviews

  201. Pingback: MSI GE72 Apache Pro 070 i7 6700HQ 16GB RAM 128GB NVMe SSD 1TB HDD NVIDIA GTX 970M 3GB 17 3 Full HD Windows reviews

  202. Pingback: Pc Wholesale CQ10 688NR Hp Compaq Presario Cq10 688nr Netbook Inteln455ia 1 66gulv 1gb1 dimm 250gb72 reviews

  203. Pingback: Toshiba Satellite L55T B5278 15 6 Laptop 8GB Memory 1TB Hard Drive Intel Core i5 Windows 8 1 Touchscreen reviews

  204. Pingback: read more

  205. Pingback: click here

  206. Pingback: read more

  207. Pingback: read more

Comments are closed.